<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>SCOREcastOnline.com &#124; Home of the Global Professional Film, Television and Game Music Community &#187; James Semple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scorecastonline.com/author/jamessemple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scorecastonline.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0.8" -->
	<itunes:summary></itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>SCOREcastOnline.com | Home of the Global Professional Film, Television and Game Music Community</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.scorecastonline.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>James Semple: 2010 Tech Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.scorecastonline.com/2011/01/09/james-semple-2010-in-2020/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scorecastonline.com/2011/01/09/james-semple-2010-in-2020/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Semple</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital audio workstation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kontakt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAMM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sampling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual instruments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scorecastonline.com/?p=1063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although some have the luxury of working with live musicians, samples are a reality for a great many composers. Let's look at some trends that took root in 2010.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div class="shr-publisher-1063"></div><p>2010 was a great year for sample libraries. Although some of  us have  the luxury of working with live musicians, samples are the  reality for  a great many composers. In my inaugural post here at <a href="http://scorecastonline.com/" target="_self">SCOREcastOnline.com</a>, share some trends I observed in the sample library world last year.</p>
<p><strong>Increasingly Powerful Sample Libraries</strong><br />
By the end of 2009, the idea of running comprehensive orchestral   templates from a single machine seemed a real possibility. In 2010,  however, the stakes have been raised again with bigger libraries  demanding more  power than ever. Last year we saw increased multi-core  support, CPU power advancements, huge amounts of RAM, 64-bit  compatibility, and an increased  uptake of SSDs. In addition, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.viennaensemblepro.com/" target="_blank">Vienna Ensemble Pro</a> (released late 2009)  made it cost-effective and easy to set up  multiple machines. Developers  are now seizing this opportunity to  increase the power of their  libraries. Sample playback engines such as <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.native-instruments.com/#/en/products/producer/kontakt-4/" target="_blank">Kontakt</a> and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.soundsonline.com/play/" target="_blank">PLAY</a> continue to  grow in sophistication meaning that modern libraries are  being able to  truly take advantage of multiple microphone positions,  complex  scripting, customized interfaces with more velocity layers and  larger  pools of round-robin samples. All of these demand more and more  power  from DAWs.</p>
<p><strong>New Standards in Sampling</strong><br />
From extensive string projects with top Hollywood engineers to   percussion libraries recorded in premiere London studios, new standards  were  set in the recording of sample libraries. Multiple microphone  positions, improved  legato/portamento, customized interfaces and more  intuitive programming  mean that the bar continues to be raised.</p>
<p><strong>Improved Workflow</strong><br />
In 2010 there were a lot of developments in areas designed to help  with  composers&#8217; workflows. It&#8217;s amazing to think that only twelve months  ago,  there were no string or choir libraries with polyphonic legato.  Now you  have <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.soundsonline.com/Hollywood-Strings" target="_blank">Hollywood Strings</a>, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.tonehammer.com/?p=4276" target="_blank">Requiem</a>, and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://cinesamples.com/products/voxos/" target="_blank">Voxos</a>. In addition, VSL released  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://vsl.co.at/en/65/71/1877/1528.vsl" target="_blank">Vienna Instrument Pro</a> adding polyphonic legato to their enormous catalog of sample libraries.  AudioBro went one step further adding  polyphonic legato linked to a <em>smart divisi script</em> to create their <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.audiobro.com/" target="_blank">LASS</a> Auto-Arranger. Native Instruments released <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.native-instruments.com/#/en/products/producer/powered-by-kontakt/session-strings/" target="_blank">Session Strings</a> with the <em> automator</em> for easily creating rapid spiccato passages. <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.projectsam.com/Products/Boxed-Products/1367" target="_blank">Symphobia 2</a> focused on pre-recorded unison/octave ensembles and pre-orchestrated  textures. Although late in the year, Cinesamples&#8217; <a rel="nofollow" href="http://cinesamples.com/products/cineorch/" target="_blank">CineOrch</a> may have  truly been one of the most remarkable and controversial  releases  featuring fully orchestrated tutti chords and octaves.</p>
<p><strong>Highly-focused Products</strong><br />
Although we had some extensive libraries, we also saw a lot of   highly-focused products. Rather than try to be the ultimate string   library or piano library we had pianos focused on soft, slow playing and   libraries of just string runs or percussion releases of a single   percussive instrument. Given the high initial outlay for creating new   products and the fact that many potential buyers will already own a lot   of high-quality libraries, such niche products seem to be a  particularly  attractive move for developers.</p>
<p><strong>Download Delivery</strong></p>
<p>In conjunction with small, focused products we have seen an   increase in vendors offering download versions of their products. In   some cases there are only download versions. In 2010, some surprisingly   large libraries have also been offered as download-only. Given the   removal of packaging/shipping costs and the fact that (like many   composers) I may suddenly need to buy a library at 2am on Sunday,   downloads are very attractive to most customers&#8230; and do I really need   to mention the instant gratification when impulse buying shiny new   libraries?</p>
<p><strong>Light Version of Libraries</strong><br />
While some vendors have offered stripped-down versions of their   libraries in the past, 2010 saw a number of &#8216;light&#8217; versions of major   libraries with clearly explained upgrade paths. In such economically   trying times, this has been a wise idea allowing consumers to buy-in   cheaply without feeling that they&#8217;re wasting their cash. In certain   cases, the reduced system demands of the light libraries have made them   particularly desirable as alternatives to the full version.</p>
<p><strong>The Return of Algorithmic Reverb</strong><br />
While many have never stopped loving <em>algorithmic</em> reverb, I think  most will agree that <em>convolution</em> has been the darling for the last  couple of years. In 2010,  algorithmic reverbs came back big-time. The  big news was that Lexicon  finally released a software plugin of their  highly esteemed <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.lexiconpro.com/product.php?id=163" target="_blank">PCM hardware reverbs</a> (I then bought a PCM 90 at a great  price on eBay!). New versions of  the popular reverb continued to  improve on their fantastic sound. The  fantastic <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.liquidsonics.com/software_reverberate.htm" target="_blank">Reverberate</a> plug-in  combined convolution with some algorithmic reverb qualities and the word  is that the next version of <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.audioease.com/Pages/Altiverb/AltiverbMain.html" target="_blank">Altiverb</a> (unfortunately not released in  2010) will also feature more of a hybrid convolution/algorithmic design.</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s Next?</strong><br />
Considering the current state of the industry, with budgets and   schedules being forever squeezed, 2010 must have been a tough year to be   a sample developer. Personally, I feel that most have responded in an   incredibly positive and ingenious manner, continuing to produce   game-changing offerings and providing amazing deals to customers. With   the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.namm.org/thenammshow/2011" target="_blank">Winter NAMM Show</a> happening this week in the USA, I guess it&#8217;s time to make some  incredibly inaccurate  predictions! Nonetheless, here are a few things  I&#8217;m hoping for in 2011:</p>
<ul>
<li>EastWest/Quantum Leap to release a brass library to compliment <em>Hollywood Strings</em></li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.spitfireaudio.com/wordpress/" target="_blank">Spitfire</a> to release more commercial libraries</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.spectrasonics.net/" target="_blank">Spectrasonics</a> (who were suspiciously quiet in 2010) to wow us all again with&#8230; something (?)</li>
<li>64-bit <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.steinberg.net/en/products/cubase/start.html" target="_blank">Cubase</a> on Mac</li>
<li>Further developments in the style of Cinesamples&#8217; <em>CineOrch</em></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong><br />
Of course this is all only my viewpoint here. I did buy a  lot of sample  libraries in 2010 but not all of them, and I didn&#8217;t want to  make any  direct comparisons when I only own two of the three big string libraries  or one of the two recent choir releases. I&#8217;m sure a lot of you have  opinions on this subject, so let&#8217;s hear them in the <strong>COMMENTS</strong> below! What were <em>your</em> favorite sample libraries from 2010?</p>
<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- Start Shareaholic Recommendations Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic Recommendations Automatic -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scorecastonline.com/2011/01/09/james-semple-2010-in-2020/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
