Loading...
You are here:  Home  >  Latest Resources  >  Current Article

Digital Performer 101: Why Choose It for Film Scoring?

By   /   June 28, 2012  /   5 Comments

John Graham explores the features that make Digital Performer one of the most popular sequencers among film and media composers.

Writing about sequencing software inevitably generates two emotion-laden responses. First, nearly every time it degenerates into a “mine’s the best” tit for tat about whose sequencer is superior. Second, the promise of features in an upcoming release muddles the discussion – how soon will the release roll out (including the question of how soon any bugs get ironed out) and how good will the new features be?

To the “my sequencer’s best” crowd I would gently remind all of us that we’ve heard very good music produced on just about every sequencing software set – and rubbish as well. Similarly, it’s worth noting that what some piece of software didn’t do three or four years ago may well have been addressed, so old saws about what “doesn’t work” in a competitor sequencer may now be inaccurate and out of date.

For Digital Performer, on the cusp of a major release (the upcoming DP 8), it is unavoidable to talk something about the promise of new features, though I’ll keep that to a minimum.

Key Features That Distinguish DP

From my perspective as a film composer, there are a number of areas that I think are outstanding about DP. These are areas that are either unique or “best in class” / second to none:

  1. Clippings – you can easily grab any combination of “stuff” – midi tracks, audio tracks, conductor info – and place it on a clipboard, ready to drag into another cue.
  2. Tempo, meter, and conductor track manipulation is fabulous and generally regarded as the best available. This includes an excellent tempo calculator and the ability to readily move barlines to fit a performance you’ve played in with free tempo, rubato, etc.
  3. Direct export to QT format of a cue with audio (including dialogue and SFX if you like).
  4. Chunks – think of it as being able to put multiple cues in one file, saving the time of reloading samples, using the same track list for similar cues and otherwise duplicating effort already expended. So if you want 4M5 to sound a lot like 2M2, you can save the 2M2 chunk and write 4M5 right away with virtually no interruption in workflow.
  5. Pitch correction is easy to use and works very well. Will do pitch to midi (pitch correction is a “very good” feature – no longer unique but so easy to work with that I put it on my Outstanding list).
  6. Consolidated Window – you can place as much as you want on a single window called the Consolidated Window. This may sound trivial but is a big deal when working fast. You can include or exclude – drag on/off or set in the preferences what parts of your sequence you want to see in this master window.
  7. Streamers and punches – you can program streamers and punches into your sequence to assist with conducting (and soloists).
  8. “Film Score” notation, that includes timings for film music, including markers on the score for dialogue or key moments (“ka-boom” for example).

Cool Stuff about DP

In the next rank are features that are not unique to DP but cool nevertheless:

  1. Very good note transcription – allows transposition for non-concert-pitched instruments like French Horn, Clarinet, or Trumpet. It corrects well for parts that are not played strictly, almost magically figuring out whether what you played in to the sequencer was intended as an eighth note (quaver) or a sixteenth note (semiquaver) followed by a sixteenth (semiquaver) rest.  Tuplets are handled very well too.
  2. Complex click tracks – I have yet to dream up a click track that you can’t program into DP.
  3. Extensive list of plugins / FX / guitar chains and other sound manipulation gadgets. These include a very good leveller, EQ, delays, and guitar stomp box emulations.
  4. Lots of audio capabilities (pitch correction, editing, slicing, stretching, etc.).
  5. Customizable interface – it is almost indescribable how many different ways you can set up your windows and tools in DP. Different colours (“skins”), different tool sets and working groups. It’s superb.
  6. Mix “takes” that allow you to keep various versions of mixes.

Things Looking Forward to in DP 8

  1. 64 bit (hooray!)
  2. Windows 7 Compatible
  3. 15 new plug-ins
  4. Support for VST plug-ins
  5. Full 1920 x 1080 HD video hardware support

Things I secretly wish for in DP!

  1.  Articulations menu in notation
  2. Percussion note-heads and the ability to use “let ring” ties

    Print       Email

About the author

John R. Graham has scored fourteen movies, dozens of trailers, short films, television, and commercials. Educated as a composer and conductor at Charterhouse, Williams College, Stanford University and UCLA, John lives in Los Angeles with his family.

  • http://www.facebook.com/kenneth.jackson.37051 Kenneth Jackson

    Again John, thank you for information on DP. I have pro tools 8 LE and I got it because I wanted Sibelius because the same company uses them (AVID). I want to know does PT do the same as DP with film scoring or is one easier than the other. Also does DP support Sibelius on its platform? It seems I see you are speaking strictly film music. Can DP be used for composing in other forms of music, like hip hop, jazz arranging, etc? I’m asking because I want to upgrade to pro tools 10, but I really need to have a little feedback on what I’m asking. Thank you very much.,,Kenny

  • D Coscina

    John great article. And so true. I’ve been in Pro Tools land for the past 8 months but I recently went back to DP and gosh, no crashes. What a novelty. If MOTU ever decides to release DP8, I think I will be firmly planted back in their camp for most of my non concert related pieces.

  • Tyrone

    Hi John.

    Thank you for the great article. I have dabbled with DP a
    few times now, and each time I am nearer to changing for good. The new 64 bit
    version will definitely help.

    My one “would like” is full elastic audio like Logic and
    Cubase. I use it in Logic from time to time, and would miss it.

    The “several chunks in one file” idea is brilliant. I can
    really see that speeding up work on multiple (but similar) cues.

  • Jorge Santos Costa

    Hi John, thanks for the nice introduction to DP. I always felt that DP is probably one of the best DAWs to work for picture if not the best. The only reason that would make me change (from Pro tools & Logic) was if Apple drop it (Logic), it happen me once when Gibson bough Studio Vision Pro and bag it. Anyway, having another working tool that works for me, won’t stop me to appreciate DP evolution closely and congrat those who have it! I’ll be happy to follow your future DP articles! Peace, Jorge Costa

  • Pingback: Digital Performer 101: Why Choose It for Film Scoring? | Home Recording Masters | Microphones, Recording Equipment and Software Reviews

  • Articles by Date

    June 2012
    S M T W T F S
    « May   Jul »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
  • The Archives

You might also like...

templateI_image

Templates I: Introduction

Read More →